La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ - Australia Versus Dr. Jart+ Cicapair™ Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30
Updated on February 05, 2024
Overview
What they are
These products are both general moisturizers. They have a total of 0 ingredients in common
Cool Features
They both contain SPF
Suited For
They're both likely to be good for fighting acne, anti aging, dry skin, brightening skin, sensitive skin and scar healing
Free From
They both do not contain any parabens
What's Inside
They both contain silicones
We independently verify ingredients, and our claims are backed by peer-reviewed research. Spot a product that needs an update? Let us know.
Ingredient Info
La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ 33 ingredients
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair™ Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 69 ingredients
What's inside (and what isn't)
What's inside (and what isn't)
At a glance
Click on any of the items below to learn more
La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ 33 ingredients
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair™ Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 69 ingredients
Key Ingredients
Benefits
Concerns
Key Ingredients
Benefits
Concerns
Ingredients Side-by-side
Ingredient Ratings
Here's what our community thinks of the ingredients in these products.
When to use
La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ 33 ingredients
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair™ Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 69 ingredients


Reviews
Here's what our community thinks