Versus

Nuface Silk Crème Activator Versus StriVectin Peptide Plump Line Filling Bounce Serum

Serum
Serum
American Brand United States
American Brand United States

Updated on December 15, 2023

Overview

What they are

These products are both reef safe serums. They have a total of 0 ingredients in common

Cool Features

They both contain AHA, hyaluronic acid and Vitamin E

Suited For

They're both likely to be good for anti aging, dry skin, brightening skin, sensitive skin, oily skin, reducing pores, scar healing, dark spots and better texture

Free From

They both do not contain any parabens or sulfates

What's Inside

They both contain common allergens and fragrances

We independently verify ingredients, and our claims are backed by peer-reviewed research. Spot a product that needs an update? Let us know.

Ingredient Info

Click any item below to learn more and see relevant ingredients

What's inside (and what isn't)

What's inside (and what isn't)

At a glance

Click on any of the items below to learn more

Key Ingredients

Benefits

Concerns

Key Ingredients

Benefits

Concerns

Ingredients Side-by-side

found in both products
Silk Crème Activator
Peptide Plump Line Filling Bounce Serum

Water

Skin Conditioning

Glycerin

Humectant
0 / 0 Helps hydrate Dry Skin IconGood for Scar Healing IconHelps brighten skin Icon

Propanediol

Solvent
Helps hydrate Dry Skin Icon

Hydroxyethyl Acrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer

Emulsion Stabilising

Imperata Cylindrica Root Extract

Skin Conditioning

When to use

1 Routine
0% use in am
100% use in pm
100% use every day
4 Routines
50% use in am
50% use in pm
75% use every day

Reviews

Here's what our community thinks

Nuface Silk Crème Activator 35 ingredients

1.00
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
What people say
Broke Me Out 100% Expensive 100% Heavy 100%
No reviews yet

Be the first to review Peptide Plump Line Filling Bounce Serum

Write the first review