Versus

Sk-II R.N.A. POWER Anti-Aging Essence Serum Versus Lancôme Advanced Génifique Youth Activating Concentrate - US

Serum
Serum
Japanese Brand Japan
French Brand France

Updated on October 11, 2024

Overview

What they are

These products are both serums. They have a total of 0 ingredients in common

Suited For

They're both likely to be good for anti aging, dry skin, brightening skin, sensitive skin, reducing pores and scar healing

Free From

They both do not contain any sulfates

What's Inside

They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens, fragrances, oils and silicones

We independently verify ingredients, and our claims are backed by peer-reviewed research. Spot a product that needs an update? Let us know.

Ingredient Info

Click any item below to learn more and see relevant ingredients

What's inside (and what isn't)

What's inside (and what isn't)

At a glance

Click on any of the items below to learn more

Key Ingredients

Benefits

Concerns

Key Ingredients

Benefits

Concerns

Ingredients Side-by-side

found in both products
R.N.A. POWER Anti-Aging Essence Serum

Water

Skin Conditioning

Butylene Glycol

Humectant
1 / 0 Helps hydrate Dry Skin Icon

Glycerin

Humectant
0 / 0 Helps hydrate Dry Skin IconGood for Scar Healing IconHelps brighten skin Icon

Galactomyces Ferment Filtrate

Humectant
Helps hydrate Dry Skin IconHelps reduce Skin Redness IconHelps reduce irritation IconHelps with Anti-Aging IconNot safe for Fungal Acne Icon

Niacinamide

Smoothing
Niacinamide IconGood for Oily Skin IconHelps reduce Skin Redness IconHelps reduce irritation IconGood for Minimizing Pores IconHelps with Anti-Aging IconGood for Dark Spots IconGood for Scar Healing IconHelps fight Acne IconHelps brighten skin Icon

When to use

2 Routines
50% use in am
50% use in pm
100% use every day
302 Routines
49% use in am
51% use in pm
93% use every day
When to use See routines that use it ->

Reviews

Here's what our community thinks

No reviews yet

Be the first to review R.N.A. POWER Anti-Aging Essence Serum

Write the first review
4.80
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
What people say
Absorbs Well 33% Expensive 33% Light 33%