Pravana Chromasilk Permanent Creme Hair Color Versus Agebeautiful Permanent Liqui-Creme Hair Color

EDTA locks them up so it's a neat little background helper ingredient.

Typical use is under 2% but numbers as high as 10-25% have been reported in hair color products.

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel looked at the whole family and concluded they're safe as used. At cosmetic concentrations, they have not been found to be skin irritants or sensitizers.

Clinical testing has found no absorption through skin so the scary-sounding oral toxicity numbers from animal studies aren't relevant to a face cream.

One real formulation note: this ingredient is a penetration enhancer so it can slightly increase how much of the other ingredients get through (though this is more of a thing for formulators to work around).

Allergy is genuinely rare; there are a handful of case reports so be sure to avoid if you're patch test positive to EDTA.

As a humectant, hydrolyzed keratin helps draw moisture from the air to your hair and skin. This helps keep your skin and hair hydrated.

Its job in a formula is boring, but useful:

Typical concentrations range from 0.1-50% and it's usually low single digits in leave-on skincare.

One thing that sets it apart from other fatty alcohols is that it's used deliberately as a penetration enhancer in topical drug delivery. This is because it "loosens" the packing of your skin's surface lipids a bit so other ingredients can get through more easily.

A study on human skin found both Oleic Acid and Oleyl Alcohol at 0.75% increased how much topical anti-inflammatory drug got through with the effect leveling off after about 12 hours.

Allergic reactions are uncommon but documented; there's a published case of a patient with atopic dermatitis who developed severe allergic contact dermatitis from a prescription cream. A patch testing traced it specifically to the Oleyl Alcohol in the formula rather than the active drug.

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel concluded Oleyl Alcohol is safe as used in cosmetics. Acute toxicity testing showed very low toxicity, animal tests showed minimal to mild skin irritation, human patch testing found low irritation and sensitization potential, and no phototoxicity or photosensitization has been reported.

It's reasonable to patch test if you have eczema, a known fatty alcohol allergy, or you've reacted to Stearyl or Cetyl Alcohol before.

Oleyl Alcohol scored a 4 out of 5 for comedogenicity in the 1989 rabbit ear study. Just know the rabbit ear test has real limits:

It's worth watching if you're acne-prone and how you will react to it really comes down to concentration, formula, and your skin.

The culprit behind fungal acne, the Malassezia yeast, feeds on fatty acids with carbon chain lengths between C11-C24. Oleic Acid, at C18, falls right into that sweet spot.

In vitro studies have shown that Oleic Acid is one of the fatty acids that induce rapid Malassezia growth in lab settings. Since this ingredient is created from Oleic Acid, it may not be fungal acne safe.

As an occlusive, it forms a protective layer on the skin that locks in moisture and prevents transepidermal water loss (TEWL). This makes it especially great for compromised skin barriers.

The "it clogs your pores" myth has been around for decades; a study found that industrial-grade mineral oil may be comedogenic but cosmetic-grade mineral oil is not (these two are very, very different).

A 2017 review concluded that cosmetic use of mineral oils and waxes does not present a risk to consumers due to absorption.

Mineral oil got a bad rap from the old rabbit ear studies. When tested on actual human skin, cosmetic-grade mineral oil showed no comedogenic activity. The rating of 0 is a correction of outdated science.

Mineral oil is an inert substance with no fatty acids so there's nothing to feed Malassezia. This ingredient is fungal acne safe.

For instance, Habanolide is a proprietary trade name for a specific aroma chemical. When used as a fragrance ingredient in cosmetics, most aroma chemicals fall under the broad labeling category of “FRAGRANCE” or “PARFUM” according to EU and US regulations.

The term 'parfum' or 'fragrance' is not regulated in many countries. In many cases, it is up to the brand to define this term.

For instance, many brands choose to label themselves as "fragrance-free" because they are not using synthetic fragrances. However, their products may still contain ingredients such as essential oils that are considered a fragrance by INCI standards.

One example is Calendula flower extract. Calendula is an essential oil that still imparts a scent or 'fragrance'.

Depending on the blend, the ingredients in the mixture can cause allergies and sensitivities on the skin. Some ingredients that are known EU allergens include linalool and citronellol.

Parfum can also be used to mask or cover an unpleasant scent.

The bottom line is: not all fragrances/parfum/ingredients are created equally. If you are worried about fragrances, we recommend taking a closer look at an ingredient. And of course, we always recommend speaking with a professional.

The CIR Expert Panel has confirmed this ingredient to be nontoxic and clinical studies show no sensitization at cosmetic use concentrations.

True allergic reactions are quite rare: a 15-year retrospective study of 6,751 patients found only 0.31% had a positive reaction (and less than half were considered clinically relevant).

It seemed that when sensitization does occur, it's most commonly linked to topical medication (like corticosteroids) and not cosmetics. Allergic contact dermatitis also appears largely limited to individuals with underlying skin conditions.

Overall, propylene glycol is a well-studied ingredient that most people can tolerate without issue.

It is commonly used in food. It should be noted sodium sulfite degrades both vitamins B1 and E.

Fun fact: Sulfites are naturally occuring in wine.

You'll also recognize water as that liquid we all need to stay alive. If you see this, drink a glass of water. Remember to stay hydrated!