Elizabeth Arden Eight Hour Cream Lip Protectant Stick Sunscreen SPF 15

The melting point of ozokerite is 58-100 C.

Ozokerite is found all over the world including Scotland, the US, and India.

Concentration regulations cap it at 8% in the US, EU, and Canada, but it's usually used around 1.25% (~0.5-2% range).

Safety-wise, the headlines can sound scarier than the evidence.

In vitro studies have shown it can generate free radicals and cause DNA damage when illuminated, and it binds weakly to estrogen receptors in a test tube. But this estrogenic activity is about a million times weaker than the body's own estradiol and hasn't been confirmed in living organisms.

Even the EU's scientific committee concluded the UV filters permitted in sunscreens have no estrogenic effects relevant to human health.

A 2021 South Korean risk assessment ran the numbers and found no significant reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, sensitization, or phototoxicity in its key animal study at the 8% concentration.

The only real concern about this ingredient is that it's a known contact/photo-allergen for some people. It's also not very photostable on its own and gradually degrades with sun exposure.

What's left is lanolin oil, and it's a light, non-greasy emollient that sits on skin, slows water loss, and softens rough patches.

Chemically, it's mostly wax esters plus some fatty acids where the majority are branched (making it structurally closer to human sebum than most plant oils).

A 2022 industry survey found lanolin oil has the highest maximum-leave on concentration of any lanolin ingredients (47% in lipsticks and the permitted range for lanolin in US OTC producrts is 12.5-50%).

The concentrations are much lower in actual face products, often between 1-10%.

Lanolin ingredients are found safe at current use levels by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel.

Lanolin has a reputation as pore clogging but that comes almost entirely from rabbit ear testing done decades ago (and that model has aged badly).

This ingredient does have a comedogenic rating of 0-1; the tests state this score means the ingredient has low or non-existent chance of clogging your pores.

Keep in mind that the authors of the rabbit ear test proposed that a material needs to score consistently above 3 in the rabbit assay before it means anything for real skin.

A separate review found the model has serious performance problems and no correlation with human experience. Concentration matters a lot too: in one study, Acetylated Lanolin Alcohol scored 4 to 5 at full strength but dropped to a 1 when diluted to 2.5%, and finished products containing "comedogenic" ingredients didn't raise microcomedone counts in people.

Since this ingredient is build with exactly the esters that Malassezia yeasts can synthesize, this ingredient may not be fungal acne safe.

In a finished formula, it acts as an emollient and slip agent that gives a smooth, non-greasy feel (also why it's so common in color cosmetics).

Rat studies show it works as a penetration enhancer: 3-5% propylene glycol noticeably increased how much indomethacin got through the skin by acting on the stratum corneum; so just a head's up that it can carry other ingredients in with it.

Older concentration reviews found it can be used up to 25% but it's usually used in much lower amounts.

The 2013 Personal Care Products Council survey reported a maximum of 13.2% in lipstick, 0.01-13.2% in leave-on products, 0.79-11.2% in rinse-off, and 3.5-7.2% in eye area products.

Safety-wise, the data is reassuring; there's no eye irritation in rabbit tests and a lipstick containing 13.8% was non-irritating and non-sensitizing in a human repeat insult patch test.

The one caveat is that undiluted Myristyl Lactate was moderately irritating in one Draize study. This is normal for a neat ester and not really relevant to how it gets used in cosmetics.

Allergy wise, it's not a known contact allergen and allergy risk is very low.

This ingredient does have a comedogenic rating of 4, but this doesn't mean a formula with this ingredient will clog pores. Human testing has proved that any finished product with this ingredient won't automatically make you break out; it really comes down to concentration, formula, and your skin.

The Malassezia yeast feeds on fatty alcohols with a chain length above 12 carbons, and this ingredient is created from myristyl alcohol (C14). It may not be fungal acne safe.

On concentrations:

So why did the EU cut back on how much you can use?

It comes down to absorption. Oxybenzone passes through skin more easily than other filters.

When the FDA tested sunscreens, every filter showed up in people's blood above the level where the agency wants extra safety testing done. But Oxybenzone showed up at by far the highest levels of the bunch.

To be clear, the FDA's point was that we need more research and not that the ingredient is dangerous. They also said to keep using sunscreen.

That high absorption, plus some animal studies pointing to effects on reproduction, is why EU regulators labeled Benzophenone-3 a hormone disruptor in 2025. An official classification is expected to follow in 2026.

It's also the most common photoallergen among sunscreen filters so it's a more frequent cause of contact/photoallergic dermatitis than most alternatives.

Places like Hawaii and Palau have also banned it over coral-reef concerns.

This ingredient has a comedogenic rating of 4 and irritancy rating of 2 based on early studies.

Just know these numbers have some caveats; comedogenic rating studies used ingredients at high concentations in pure form and not how they behave in a finished product (where they're used in lower percentages and balanced by other ingredients).

Comedogenic ratings also don't account for individual skin or how a product is actually used.

This ingredient is generally safe for use in cosmetics with one nuance: some grades of candelilla wax can naturally contain benzyl alcohol at concentrations high enough to require declaration under EU labeling rules. This isn't a concern for most people but relevant for those with fragrance sensitivities.

Candelilla wax contains fatty acids (mainly C31) and wax esters that can be used by the Malassezia yeast, so this ingredient may not be fungal acne safe.

You might see Euphorbia Cerifera "Cera" instead of "wax". This is because some brands, databases, or labels use it interchangeably; they're the same ingredient.

Fun fact: This wax has the highest melting point of all natural waxes and low solubility.

Concentration use usually lands somewhere between 0.1-3% for face products.

Allergies to this ingredient are uncommon and most reported cases from from medication creams rather than cosmetics.

This ingredient does have a comedogenic rating of 2, but this doesn't mean a formula with this ingredient will clog pores. Human testing has proved that any finished product with this ingredient won't automatically make you break out; it really comes down to concentration, formula, and your skin.

The Malassezia yeast feeds on fatty alcohols with a chain length above 12 carbons, and this ingredient is a C14 primary fatty alcohol. This ingredient may not be fungal acne safe.

In cosmetics, this ingredient is used as an emollient and occlusive that softens skin, spreads pigment nicely, and slows water loss.

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel has cleared it as safe up to 16% and you'll usually see it well under that in leave-on skincare.

There's no direct study on this ingredient for fungal acne, but you may want to avoid this ingredient if you have been diagnosed. This is because the Malassezia yeast can't build its own fatty acids and has to scavenge them from skin lipids. Lanolin-derived materials are long-chain esters that the yeast's lipases could in principle break down.

This ingredient has tested to be non-sensitizing in animal studies with only a low incidence of reactions across decades of widespread human use. People with already-compromised skin or lanolin allergies should patch-test because that's where the risk concentrates.

Old rabbit-ear testing scored it 4-5/5 for pore-clogging at full strength and at 50%, but only 1 once diluted to 2.5%.

Human testing later showed that finished products containing "comedogenic" ingredients aren't necessarily comedogenic themselves. Just remember that concentration and formulation matter far more than the ingredient's presence on the label.

In comedogenic testing, Beeswax scored a 0-2, which is on the low end. Whether or not a product clogs your pores really comes down to the formula as a whole (not any single ingredient on its own) and your skin.

Cera Alba is the white, bleached form of this ingredient.

Just so you know, beeswax is not vegan since it is animal-derived. It cannot be removed with water, but can be taken off with an oil cleanser.

People with a known Propolis allergy also report to have reactions from beeswax.

Beeswax's wax esters are derived primarily from palmitic and oleic acid (C16 and C18:1). Both of these fall within the C11-C24 feeding window.

The Malassezia yeast can potentially cleave these esters and release usable fatty acids, so this ingredient may not be fungal acne safe. However, not everyone will react to this ingredient.

Because it is not a free-fatty acid, this ingredient is fungal acne safe (there's nothing for Malassezia to feed on).

For instance, Habanolide is a proprietary trade name for a specific aroma chemical. When used as a fragrance ingredient in cosmetics, most aroma chemicals fall under the broad labeling category of “FRAGRANCE” or “PARFUM” according to EU and US regulations.

The term 'parfum' or 'fragrance' is not regulated in many countries. In many cases, it is up to the brand to define this term.

For instance, many brands choose to label themselves as "fragrance-free" because they are not using synthetic fragrances. However, their products may still contain ingredients such as essential oils that are considered a fragrance by INCI standards.

One example is Calendula flower extract. Calendula is an essential oil that still imparts a scent or 'fragrance'.

Depending on the blend, the ingredients in the mixture can cause allergies and sensitivities on the skin. Some ingredients that are known EU allergens include linalool and citronellol.

Parfum can also be used to mask or cover an unpleasant scent.

The bottom line is: not all fragrances/parfum/ingredients are created equally. If you are worried about fragrances, we recommend taking a closer look at an ingredient. And of course, we always recommend speaking with a professional.

Topically applied tocopherol has been shown to protect against UV damage by ramping up the skin's own natural defense enzymes.

It also acts as a skin conditioning agent; some studies show that regular topical use can improve the skin's water-binding capacity over 2-4 weeks.

This ingredient is especially loved for being a team player. When combined with Vitamin C, the photoprotective effect of both ingredients roughly doubles and the combo also helps reduce UV-induced DNA damage.

This ingredient has some brightening potential but it's more of a prevention ingredient than spot-fader. Cell studies show it can slow down melanin production but it's worth noting that it's not the most powerful brightener out there.

In formulations, it also serves as a stabilizer that helps protect other oxidation-prone ingredients from degrading.

Concentrations usually range from 0.1-1% in most leave-on products.

This ingredient is an emollient. Emollients help soothe and soften the skin. They do this by creating a protective film on your skin. This barrier helps trap moisture and keeps your skin hydrated. Emollients may be effective at treating dry or itchy skin.

Due to the differences in vegetables, the benefits may vary.

The ranges of the fatty acids differ so much because it varies batch to batch depending on the cultivar and the growing conditions.

In skincare, it mostly does good plant oil stuff: it softens, sits on the surface to slow water evaporation, and makes formulas feel richer.

Now the honest part. Corn oil isn't studied much in dermatology but we do know it's the go-to vehicle in lab research. So there's decades of research where corn oil was the boring control; it never produced an effect of its own but we also don't have much research on it doing something exciting for your skin.

The one thing worth talking about is linoleic. Acne-prone follicles tend to be low in linoleate and a small study found topical linoleic acid shrank microcomedones by around 25% over a month. That was pure linoleic acid and not corn oil so it should be filed under "promising theory" rather than "proven benefit".

Concentration use can be anywhere from trace amounts to about 14% (the high end shows up in cleansers, moisturizers, body creams, and masks). Corn germ oil, which is basically the same ingredient under a different INCI name, has been reported as high as 25% but most of the time you're looking at low single digits.

Corn oil itself isn't a common allergen. Allergies to actual corn are triggered by corn proteins which is mostly refined out of the oil for cosmetic use. How much of the protein removed depends on the manufacturing process, so it's always better to patch test just in case.

This ingredient does have a comedogenic rating of 0-3, but this doesn't mean a formula with this ingredient will clog pores.

Human testing has proved that any finished product with this ingredient won't automatically make you break out; it really comes down to concentration, formula, and your skin.

The Malassezia yeast can't make its own fatty acids and breaks down oils around it to feed. Lab research shows the yeast grows when fatty acids in the C11-C24 range are available. Since corn oil is almost entirely C16-C18 fatty acids, this ingredient may not be fungal acne safe.

As a preservative, it is used to stabilize products and prevent them from degrading. Specifically, BHT prevents degradation from oxidation.

The concerns related to BHT come from oral studies; this ingredient is currently allowed for use by both the FDA and EU.

However, it was recently restricted for use in the UK as of April 2024.

You should know this ingredient is a known EU fragrance allergen.

Animal studies classifies this ingredient as a weak-to-moderate skin sensitizer and clinical patch testing on eczema patients confirmed it to be both a contact allergen and irritant.

The term 'citral' is a collective term for two geometric isomers: geranial/Citral A and neral/Citral B.

The term 'fragrance' is not regulated in many countries. In many cases, it is up to the brand to define this term. For instance, many brands choose to label themselves as "fragrance-free" because they are not using synthetic fragrances. However, their products may still contain ingredients such as essential oils that are considered a fragrance.

Citronellol is a modified terpene. Terpenes are unsaturated hydrocarbons found in plants. They make up the primary part of essential oils.

Citronellol is not able to be absorbed into deeper layers of the skin. It has low permeability,

Citronellol is also a natural insect repellent.

Geraniol can be found in many essential oils including Rose Oil and Citronella Oil. The scent of Geraniol is often described as "rose-like". Many foods also contain Geraniol for fruit flavoring.

Geraniol can irritate the skin when exposed to air. However, irritation depends on the ability of geraniol to penetrate into the skin. In general, geraniol is not able to penetrate skin easily.

Geraniol is colorless and has low water-solubility. However, it is soluble in common organic solvents.

Like citronellol, it is a natural insect repellent.

2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, (2E)-

You'll typically see this ingredient used in very small amounts; anything above 0.001% in a leave-on product or 0.01% in a rinse-off has to be named on the label in the EU. The citrus oils that carry it sit around 0.5-1% in a finished formula.

Fresh limonene is a weak allergen; the real issue is that it slowly reacts with air and then breaks down from oxidation to create hydroperoxides (which are strong sensitizers). This is why suppliers are required to keep the peroxide value below 20 mmol.

Positive reactions in people being investigated for eczema vary:

It's worth skipping if you have a known fragrance allergy or a compromised barrier, but the risk is low for most people.

Older or long-opened products are also more likely to bother you than fresh ones due to oxidation.

The EU requires it to be named on the label above 0.001% in leave-on and 0.01% in rinse-off products.

Fresh linalool is a weak sensitizer but air exposure turns some of it into hydroperoxides, which are strong sensitizers. Those oxidation products are the actual allergy concern.

Patch-test clinics see positive reactions to linalool hydroperoxides in about 4% to 12% of dermatitis patients depending on country and test concentration.

Resassuringly, one analytical study found hydroperoxide levels in real fragranced products to be orders of magnitude below what induced sensitization in animal studies with no evidence of oxidation building up during normal storage.

The practical takeaway is that linalool is fine for most people but worth avoiding if you have a confirmed fragrance contact allergy or a badly compromised barrier.

Products stored a long time after opening are also the high-risk scenario since that is when oxidation happens.

The scent of linalool is described as floral, spicy tropical, and citrus-like.

On a cellular level, it disrupts the cell membranes of microbes by poking holes that make the cell leak. This shuts down the chemical reactions the microbe needs to make energy so it can no longer survive.

Another perk of this ingredient is that it stays functional across a wide pH range (3-10).

You'll often see it paired with boosters like Ethylhexylglycerin; one study showed that a 1:9 ratio of Ethylhexylglycerin to Phenoxyethanol damages bacterial membranes as effectively as doubling the Phenoxyethanol concentration on its own.

Typical use concentrations range from 0.3-1% depending on the formula, and this ingredient is capped at 1% int the EU.

Safety-wise, the fear mongering does not hold up to the evidence. The EU's Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety and FDA consider it safe as a preservative at up to 1%, including for children of all ages.

Adverse systemic effects only showed up in animal studies at exposures roughly 200x higher than what people get from cosmetics. And despite its very widespread use, this ingredient is a rare sensitizer and allergic reactions are uncommon.

A 2021 paper looked at skincare formulations containing iron oxides and found that they reduced transmission of blue light when measured optically. In simple terms, the pigment particles helped block or scatter part of the visible light spectrum in lab testing and the authors suggest this could translate into better protection against blue-light-related skin effects.

There is also clinical and experimental research showing that tinted products containing iron oxides can reduce visible light-induced pigmentation:

Please note, whether a product reduces visible or blue light depends on things like:

In the EU's CosIng database, iron oxides are only listed as a colorant. CosIng groups ingredients by their main cosmetic role, such as colorant, preservative, or UV filter.

Though studies say iron oxides can "attenuate blue light", they're describing an optical property and not an officially recognized cosmetic function.

So CosIng isn’t contradicting the research. It’s just classifying iron oxides by what they officially are: pigments that add color.

Ci 77891 is commonly found in sunscreens due to its ability to block UV rays.