Versus

Cetaphil Moisturising Lotion - UK Versus La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ - Australia

General Moisturizer
General Moisturizer
American Brand United States
French Brand France

Updated on July 16, 2024

Overview

What they are

These products are both general moisturizers. They have a total of 0 ingredients in common

Cool Features

They both contain Vitamin E

Suited For

They're both likely to be good for fighting acne, anti aging, dry skin, brightening skin, sensitive skin and scar healing

Free From

They both do not contain any parabens

What's Inside

They both contain silicones

We independently verify ingredients, and our claims are backed by peer-reviewed research. Spot a product that needs an update? Let us know.

Ingredient Info

Click any item below to learn more and see relevant ingredients

What's inside (and what isn't)

What's inside (and what isn't)

At a glance

Click on any of the items below to learn more

Key Ingredients

Benefits

Concerns

Key Ingredients

Benefits

Concerns

Ingredients Side-by-side

found in both products
Cicaplast Baume B5+

When to use

310 Routines
48% use in am
52% use in pm
99% use every day
When to use See routines that use it ->
4,836 Routines
27% use in am
73% use in pm
82% use every day
When to use See routines that use it ->

Reviews

Here's what our community thinks

Cetaphil Moisturising Lotion 16 ingredients

2.00
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
What people say
Broke Me Out 63% Irritating 50% Hydrating 38%
3.80
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
What people say
Heavy 52% Works Well 45% Hydrating 42%