Versus

Abena Zinc Ointment Versus La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ - Australia

General Moisturizer
General Moisturizer
Danish Brand Denmark
French Brand France

Updated on November 13, 2024

Overview

What they are

These products are both general moisturizers. They have a total of 0 ingredients in common

Cool Features

They both contain SPF and Vitamin E

Suited For

They're both likely to be good for fighting acne, anti aging, dry skin and scar healing

Free From

They both do not contain any harsh alcohols, common allergens, fragrances, oils or parabens

What's Inside

They both contain sulfates

We independently verify ingredients, and our claims are backed by peer-reviewed research. Spot a product that needs an update? Let us know.

Ingredient Info

Click any item below to learn more and see relevant ingredients

Abena Zinc Ointment 9 ingredients

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ 33 ingredients

What's inside (and what isn't)

What's inside (and what isn't)

At a glance

Click on any of the items below to learn more

Abena Zinc Ointment 9 ingredients

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ 33 ingredients

Key Ingredients

Benefits

Concerns

Ingredients Side-by-side

found in both products
Cicaplast Baume B5+

Ingredient Ratings

Here's what our community thinks of the ingredients in these products.

When to use

Abena Zinc Ointment 9 ingredients

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ 33 ingredients

5 Routines
0% use in am
100% use in pm
60% use every as_needed
4,835 Routines
27% use in am
73% use in pm
82% use every day
When to use See routines that use it ->

Reviews

Here's what our community thinks

Abena Zinc Ointment 9 ingredients

3.00
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
What people say
Doesn't Work 100% Drying 100% Great Value 100%
3.80
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
What people say
Heavy 52% Works Well 45% Hydrating 42%