Versus

Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner Versus Shiseido Tsubaki Premium Repair Hair Water Mist

Leave-in Conditioner
Styling Creams & Spray
Australian Brand Australia
Japanese Brand Japan

Updated on November 04, 2024

Overview

Suited For

They're both likely to be good for anti aging, dry skin and scar healing

Free From

They both do not contain any sulfates

What's Inside

They both contain fragrances, parabens and silicones

We independently verify ingredients, and our claims are backed by peer-reviewed research. Spot a product that needs an update? Let us know.

Ingredient Info

Click any item below to learn more and see relevant ingredients

What's inside (and what isn't)

What's inside (and what isn't)

At a glance

Click on any of the items below to learn more

Benefits

Concerns

Key Ingredients

Benefits

Concerns

Ingredients Side-by-side

found in both products

When to use

1 Routine
100% use in am
0% use in pm
100% use every day
6 Routines
50% use in am
50% use in pm
67% use every day

Reviews

Here's what our community thinks

2.00
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
5.00
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
What people say
Soft 100%