Welcome to our breakdown of the 17 best Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner dupes and alternatives.
Looking for dupes for a different product? You can use our Dupe Finder to search for them!
If you'd like to see the all of the Muk dupes that we've found, check out our best Muk dupes guide.
We use hundreds of science-backed factors to find you the best dupes.
Learn more about our dupe methodology
Our Roundup
Here's a quick roundup of our findings. Continue reading for the full breakdown!
Ion's Styling Solutions Leave-In Conditioner is the dupe with the most similar ingredients. Our matching methodology puts it at an 47% ingredient match!
Of all of the dupes for this product, Pantene's Miracle Rescue 10-in-1 Leave In Conditioner Spray is the most liked by our community. Our matching algorithm puts it at an 60% overall match!
- Ion Styling Solutions Leave-In Conditioner 1
- Ion Swimmer's Leave In Conditioner 2
- Pantene Pro-V Moisturizing Leave-In Conditioner 3
- Pantene Miracle Rescue 10-in-1 Leave In Conditioner Spray 4
- Bed Head by TIGI Ego Boost Split End Mender & Leave-In Conditioner 5
- Sachajuan Leave In Conditioner 6
- SexyHair Healthy Sexy Hair Tri-Wheat Leave-In Conditioner 7
- Generic Value Products Leave In Conditioner Compare to Its a 10 Miracle Leave-in 8
- Malibu C Leave-In Conditioner Mist 9
- Design Essentials Bamboo And Silk HCO Leave-In Conditioner 10
- John Frieda Detox & Repair Care & Protect Spray 11
- John Frieda Volume Lift Lightweight Conditioning Mist 12
- AG Care Conditioning Mist Detangling Spray 13
- ApHogee Curlific! Moisture Rich Leave-In 14
- Generic Value Products Leave In Treatment with Keratin Compare to It’s a 10 Miracle Leave-in Plus Keratin 15
- Aussie Moisture Recharge Leave-In Conditioner Spray 16
- John Frieda Frizz Ease Miraculous Recovery Daily Miracle Leave-In Conditioner 17
Overview
What it is
Leave-in conditioner with 17 ingredients
Cool Features
It is cruelty-free and fungal acne (malassezia) safe
Suited For
It has ingredients that are good for anti aging, dry skin, sensitive skin and scar healing
Free From
It doesn't contain any harsh alcohols, oils or sulfates
Ion Styling Solutions Leave-In Conditioner
66% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both cruelty-free leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 9 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols, oils or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for dry skin, sensitive skin and scar healing.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $18.19 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Ion Swimmer's Leave In Conditioner
64% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both cruelty-free leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 8 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols or oils. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for dry skin, sensitive skin and scar healing.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $18.70 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
61% match
with the ingredients and function of Pantene Pro-V Moisturizing Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 6 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for sensitive skin.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
60% match
with the ingredients and function of Pantene Miracle Rescue 10-in-1 Leave In Conditioner Spray
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 6 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $20.02 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Bed Head by TIGI Ego Boost Split End Mender & Leave-In Conditioner
60% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 11 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols, oils or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances, parabens and silicones.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $17.02 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Sachajuan Leave In Conditioner
60% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 8 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols, oils or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $8.01 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
SexyHair Healthy Sexy Hair Tri-Wheat Leave-In Conditioner
59% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 10 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances, parabens and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for sensitive skin.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $11.75 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Generic Value Products Leave In Conditioner Compare to Its a 10 Miracle Leave-in
59% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 9 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols, oils or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances, parabens and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for anti aging and sensitive skin.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Malibu C Leave-In Conditioner Mist
57% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both cruelty-free leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 8 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for dry skin, sensitive skin and scar healing.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $8.00 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
57% match
with the ingredients and function of Design Essentials Bamboo And Silk HCO Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 8 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols, oils or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for sensitive skin.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $0.51 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
John Frieda Detox & Repair Care & Protect Spray
56% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 10 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances, parabens and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for anti aging and sensitive skin.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
56% match
with the ingredients and function of John Frieda Volume Lift Lightweight Conditioning Mist
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 8 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for sensitive skin.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
56% match
with the ingredients and function of AG Care Conditioning Mist Detangling Spray
Dupe Explained
These products are both cruelty-free leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 7 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for sensitive skin.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $0.01 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
ApHogee Curlific! Moisture Rich Leave-In
55% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both cruelty-free leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 10 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for sensitive skin.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $18.00 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Generic Value Products Leave In Treatment with Keratin Compare to It’s a 10 Miracle Leave-in Plus Keratin
54% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 5 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols, oils or sulfates. They both contain fragrances, parabens and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for sensitive skin.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $12.51 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Aussie Moisture Recharge Leave-In Conditioner Spray
53% match
with the ingredients and function of Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both cruelty-free leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 8 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Muk Deep Muk Ultra Soft Leave-In Conditioner
51% match
with the ingredients and function of John Frieda Frizz Ease Miraculous Recovery Daily Miracle Leave-In Conditioner
Dupe Explained
These products are both leave-in conditioners that contain. They've got a total of 8 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any harsh alcohols or sulfates. They both contain common allergens, fragrances and silicones.
They're both likely to be good for anti aging and sensitive skin.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $19.02 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
We're dedicated to providing you with the most up-to-date and science-backed ingredient info out there.
The data we've presented on this page has been verified by a member of the SkinSort Team.
Read more about us
