The Body Deli Radiance Enzyme Superfood Peel (Illuminating)

As yeast eats through its growth medium, it leaves behind a nutrient soup of amino acids, peptides, vitamins, and minerals.

The component with the most actual research behind it, beta-glucan, is a polysaccharide that acts as a barrier-supportive humectant with antioxidant and skin-soothing properties.

Typical use concentrations range from 1-3%.

Fungal acne: This ingredient may not be considered fungal-acne safe. Even though Saccharomyces isn't the same yeast as Malassezia, fermentation can produce fatty acids in the C11-24 range that Malassezia feeds on.

A 2023 review noted that probiotic fermentation ingredients like this one can enhance antioxidant capacity, reduce UV-induced oxidative damage, and support barrier function.

One clinical study from the same year showed a Lactobacillus ferment lysate significantly reduced transepidermal water loss and improved skin hydration.

Another review highlighted that topical Lactobacillus-based preparations can improve ceramide levels in the stratum corneum, support barrier integrity, and even help reduce S. aureus colonization in atopic dermatitis.

Why is this so cool?

Basically, your skin's outer layer works as a brick wall; skin cells are bricks and ceramides are the mortar holding it together. Moisture escapes, irritants get in, and your skin gets dry and reactive when ceramide levels drop. On top of that, "bad" skin bacteria S. aureus loves to move in when your barrier is weak to make inflammation and irritation worse.

So Lactobacillus ferment is basically patching the wall and evicting the troublemaker when it boosts ceramide production and help keep S. aureus in check.

On top of all this, it also acts as a mild antimicrobial preservative booster.

Just so you know, most studies focus on specific strains or the lysate form rather than this generic "Lactobacillus Ferment", so results can vary.

Though it's a promising ingredient, it doesn't have decades of robust clinical data behind it just yet.

Lactobacillus Ferment is generally considered safe for fungal-acne prone skin. The key thing to understand is that it comes from bacteria, not yeast or fungus.

Yeast-derived ferments (like galactomyces) have been shown to activate a protein that's linked to Malassezia-related skin issues whereas lactobacillus doesn't have that problem.

Its byproducts also don't contain the types of fatty acids (C11-24 chain lengths) that Malassezia feeds on.

One in-vitro study found that this ingredient tells your skin cells to produce more of the proteins (filaggrin, loricrin, and involucrin) for building a strong and healthy barrier. This study also found this ingredient to be a solid antioxidant that helped neutralize damage against UV and pollution.

A study with people from 2010 found that sensitive, reactive skin using a cream with 10% of this ingredient for a month became noticeably less dry, less reactive, and harder to irritate compared to the group using a plain cream.

In short, this ingredient is a well-tolerated ingredient that can help with barrier repair, antioxidant protection, and calming reactive skin.

This ingredient is generally considered fungal acne (Malassezia) safe; Bifidobacterium is a bacterium, not a yeast or fungus.

The fungal acne concern with fermented ingredients mainly applies to yeast-derived ferments like Saccharomyces and Galactomyces, because those are in the same kingdom as Malassezia and could theoretically contain residual compounds that feed it.

Bifida is a completely different organism, so on its own it doesn't provide a food source for the Malassezia yeast that causes fungal acne.

When sulfur touches skin, it reacts with an amino acid in skin cells (called cysteine) to create cystine and hydrogen sulfide.

That hydrogen sulfide helps loosen dead skin cells to exfoliate. And here's a geeky detail: the smaller the Sulfur particles, the more they interact with skin and the better they work.

Sulfur also has antifungal and antibacterial activity, which is why you'll see it in both acne treatments and dandruff shampoos.

In the US, acne products can use 3-10% sulfur while dandruff products use 2-5%. It's also often paired with Sodium Sulfacetamide, and using that combo twice daily for 12 weeks reduced inflammatory acne spots by about 80%.

The most common complains are the smell and dryness. Otherwise, side effects are uncommon.

If you have a "sulfa" allergy, that's an allergy to sulfonamide drugs and this doesn't mean you'll react to elemental sulfur.

A 1972 study suggested sulfur might clog pores. Elemental sulfur caused some clogged pores on rabbit ears and human backs (though the researchers noted the effect was mild).

A 1978 follow-up tested this on 52 people. After six weeks of patches with 5% Sulfur, skin biopsies showed no link between Sulfur and clogged pores. The surprise? The base the Sulfur was mixed into was what caused clogged pores. Later reviewers also noted that other studies couldn't repeat the 1972 results.

So why does Sulfur have a comedogenic rating of 3?

That number comes from a 1989 rabbit ear study by dermatologist James Fulton, which gave a 3 to water-soluble sulfur specifically. Even so, a 3 isn't a big red flag. Fulton's own scale treats 2 to 3 as borderline.

Human testing has also proved that any finished product with a comedogenic ingredient won't automatically make you break out; it really comes down to concentration, formula, and your skin.

In skincare, proteases act as biological catalysts that mimic this natural desquamation process. You can think of it as giving your skin's own renewal system a nudge.

By breaking down the bonds that hold dead skin cells together, proteases help accelerate cell turnover to:

One reason they're becoming a popular AHA alternative is because proteases are considered effective while also being well-tolerated on skin. Because they work at a protein level rather than by lowering the skin pH, they can be a good option for those sensitive to AHAs.

Available in vitro and in vivo studies show positive exfoliant results but clinical (human) trials specifically on enzymatic exfoliation are still limited at this time.

Just one thing worth noting: temperature, pH, and stabilization are important factors that affect enzyme activity. The formulation quality definitely matters with this ingredient.

This ingredient can be either microbial sourced or plant-derived (papain from papaya, bromelain from pineapple).

Unlike other exfoliants, papain can work without causing significant irritation.

Beyond exfoliation, its proteolytic action also helps soothe irritated skin and supports the healing of minor wounds.

A 2024 in vivo/in vitro study confirmed its potential to suppress skin inflammation and improve transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in atopic dermatitis models.

Just one thing worth noting: there are reports of allergic responses in individuals with a papaya or latex sensitivity. Be sure to patch test if you're in this camp.

Besides exfoliation, it also has anti-inflammatory properties by blocking the inflammation signaling pathways.

It is considered gentler than traditional AHAs or physical scrubs and is a great option for sensitive skin. At this time, most of the clinical trial data on enzyme exfoliants is still limited and further in vivo research is needed.

Typical concentrations for this ingredient range between 0.1-5%.

Bromelain's use in cosmetic formulations has been limited by its sensitivity to pH and temperature (it maintains best stability at pH 5.0). This means how effective is it in a finished product can vary depending on how well the formula is designed.

Spirulina Platensis also contains Vitamin A, Vitamin E, and proteins.

All the research on is it the last kind and it's usually sold as "Simmondsia Chinensis Seed Oil + Dunaliella Salina Extract". So a product having this on the label doesn't guarantee it's the version that was studied.

In cosmetics, it's a skin conditioning agent sold as an anti-glycation and antioxidant active for sun care.

The main study behind it: 25 women used a cream with 1% of the extract on one side of the face and placebo on the other for 8 weeks during a Portuguese summer with daily beach-level sun.

The active side had fewer wrinkles, fewer red spots, lower glycation scores, and calmer reactions to a histamine challenge compared to the placebo side.

Lab tests on skin explants back this up with less inflammatory signals and less of the glycation marker.

Just know this is one small study done by the supplier, so take it as promising rather than proven for now.

Tolerance data looks good: a 50 person repeat insult patch test showed no sensitization at all and 48 hour patch tests came back with zero reactions. There are also no allergy case reports.

Typical use is ~1%.

No comedogenicity testing has been published for this ingredient so nobody can give you a real rating.

The extract itself is used at around 1% and carotenoids are not known comedogens. The variable is the carrier; the colorless-carotenoid version ships in jojoba seed oil or hydrogenated polydecene.

So the question of whether it will clog pores is really about the finished formula, not this ingredient.

Here's what the research shows:

In-vitro shows it calms inflammation signals; the most skin-relevant study put a kelp extract on human skin cells and then hit them with inflammatory triggers. The kelp-treated cells produced less of the inflammatory messenger molecules that normally get released.

In a realistic 3D model of skin, the pre-treated tissue held onto its cell-to-cell "seals" better and leaked less water (basically the lab version of a strong vs. weak skin barrier).

Two honest notes: the seal effect only showed up in the 3D model and at higher doses the extract started harming the cells (so more might not be better)

Fucoidan is why kelp gets talked about; it's the sulfated sugar molecule that brands like to name-drop. When four fucoidans were compared, the one from Macrocystis pyrifera was the most active. Just know this was from immune research and not skincare research.

On real people, the numbers look good (with an asterisk). The strongest evidence is all on Macrocystis Pyrifera Ferment inside one company's finished serum and not the plain extract.

Using it twice daily for eight weeks raised skin moisture 16 percent and cut water loss through the skin by 11 percent. A stripping test that repeatedly tapes and peels the skin surface found treated skin held up 30 percent better.

The standout result: half the face was prepped for three weeks and then the whole face got a 70 percent glycolic peel. The prepped side had recovered 71 percent of its barrier versus 23 percent untreated two hours later. A separate review also reported less visible redness and improvement in visible aging measures.

Three asterisk: It's the ferment, not the extract. The kelp isn't necessarily doing all the work since it's the whole formula. And it was funded by The Estée Lauder Companies with several authors on staff.

There's no fixed concentration published for this ingredient but real-world use survey shows this ingredient can be used up to 36%. There's an extra wrinkle for leave-on products since these extracts are usually supplier pre-diluted in water, glycerin, or propanediol.So "5%" on the bottle might mean under 1% for actual kelp solids.

On allergies: kelp is naturally iodine-rich, so people with a known iodine or seafood ingredient sensitivity should patch test.

You'll see algae listed as a 5/5 on a lot of pore-clogging charts and that number doesn't come from anywhere; it's not in the original rabbit-ear studies that most comedogenic ratings trace back to.

The reasoning behind the reputation is that seaweed is high in iodine and iodine can trigger acne-like breakouts when eaten. This traces back to a 1976 letter in Archives of Dermatology describing two women whose breakouts cleared after they stopped taking high-dose kelp supplements orally.

And the reaction of these two women wasn't clogged pores at all: it was an iodine-triggered pustular rash. Later research found normal dietary iodine doesn't meaningfully affect acne either and nobody has shown topical algae delivers enough iodine to matter.

What we do have is dozens of brown and red algae ingredients found to be non-irritating and non-sensitizing, and a handful of studies that found algae compounds may actually help acne.

However, plenty of people do report breaking out from algae-containing products. Skin is individual and it's worth avoiding if yours has reacted to algae before.

Betula Alba Juice contains manganese and several amino acids.

Polysaccharides help hydrate the top layer of skin due to its ability to mimic natural carbohydrates.

However, this exfoliating effect only happens at high concentrations (20%) which can be hard to find in cosmetic products.

Due to this, citric acid is usually included in small amounts as a pH adjuster. This helps keep products slightly more acidic and compatible with skin's natural pH.

In skincare formulas, citric acid can:

While it can provide some skin benefits, research shows lactic acid and glycolic acid are generally more effective and less irritating exfoliants.

Most citric acid used in skincare today is made by fermenting sugars (usually from molasses). This synthetic version is identical to the natural citrus form but easier to stabilize and use in formulations.

Rosacea skin has a lower threshold for acids generally, with 62.5% of rosacea subjects in one study reacting to lactic acid in a sting test. This is why we mark citric acid as a potential rosacea trigger.

However, this ingredient shows up as a pH adjuster or chelator at roughly 0.1-1% in many products. These low levels are unlikely to be an issue for rosacea skin and becomes a potential trigger at exfoliating concentrations (20%). Because everybody's skin is unique, we recommend a patch test if you are unsure.