Etude House Matte Formula Brow Auto Pencil

Synthetically created CI 77492 is considered safer than those naturally found. This is because the synthetically created version may contain less impurities. Iron oxides are generally non-toxic and non-allergenic.

Zinc Stearate is hydrophobic and repels water.

This ingredient can be sourced from non-animal or animal sources. It is best to reach out to the brand to see where they source this ingredient from.

It is considered non-comedogenic and vegan-friendly.

This ingredient has a well-established safety record by the CIR Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety.

Synthetic Waxes are straight/branched-chain hydrocarbons with no ester bond or fatty acids. That means there is nothing for the Malassezia yeast to feed on.

It is important to note this ingredient comes from a tree that is part of the Toxicodendron species that are well-known for having urushiol, an allergen also found in poison ivy.

Though this ingredient comes from the fruit instead of sap (the sap contains the substance that causes itchy rashes), there is a very small chance that sensitive people could react.

It doesn't do anything active and just sits on skin to soften it and slow water loss.

The CIR reviews of this ingredient reported concentration usage across a wide range (0.0001% - 70%) depending on the product type. You'll most likely see double digits (~1-5%) in emulsions and double digits in sticks + balms.

This ingredient may not be fungal acne safe; the Malassezia yeast feeds on chains longer than 12 carbons which is exactly what this ingredient is built from (C12, C14, C16, and C18).

It's worth being honest that the lab picture isn't one-directional: medium-chain triglycerides and medium-chain free fatty acids were actually toxic to Malassezia in vitro, suppressing M. furfur and M. sympodialis. However, there's no human skin data showing that protective effect holds in a real formula.

The risk of allergies is low; Hydrogenated Coconut Oil caused no irritation after a single patch application and no sign of sensitization on retest 14 days late. This is also a refined triglyceride with no coconut protein left, so it's not likely to trigger coconut food allergies. But if you have reacted to coconut in cosmetics before, it's best to avoid this ingredient.

This ingredient shows up on a lot of ""pore-clogging"" lists but there's no real evidence behind that. It doesn't even have a comedogenic rating from an actual study; the numbers you'll find online come from blogs citing other blogs.

Ratings for other ingredients mostly come from a 1980s rabbit ear test. This test doesn't translate well to human skin or to real products because the ingredient sits at a much lower percentage. Some people still find it breaks them out. So if that's you, definitely trust your skin.

Synthetically created Ci 77491 is considered safer than those naturally found. This is because the synthetically created version may contain less impurities. Iron oxides are generally non-toxic and non-allergenic.

Ci 77891 is commonly found in sunscreens due to its ability to block UV rays.

It is also an emollient and helps condition the skin.

This ingredient is often coated with metal oxides like titanium dioxide. Trace amounts of heavy metals may be found in mica, but these metals are not harmful in our personal products.

Mica has been used since prehistoric times throughout the world. Ancient Egyptian, Indian, Greek, Roman, Aztec, and Chinese civilizations have used mica.