Sugar Cosmetics Arch Arrival Brow Definer

Synthetically created Ci 77491 is considered safer than those naturally found. This is because the synthetically created version may contain less impurities. Iron oxides are generally non-toxic and non-allergenic.

This ingredient is often coated with metal oxides like titanium dioxide. Trace amounts of heavy metals may be found in mica, but these metals are not harmful in our personal products.

Mica has been used since prehistoric times throughout the world. Ancient Egyptian, Indian, Greek, Roman, Aztec, and Chinese civilizations have used mica.

The process of hydrogenation also swaps most of the unsaturated fats for saturated ones, mainly palmitic and stearic acid. This makes it more stable and less prone to going rancid as well.

Concentration data shows formulas containing up to ~21% and none were irritating/sensitizing in clinical testing; products in the 10.6-29.86% range came back clean so anything from 1-20% is realistic depending on how solid the product needs to be.

Allergy risk is low as well; cottonseed allergy is a reaction to cottonseed proteins and refining strips those out for cosmetic use. Though people that are hypersensitive to cottonseed proteins did not react to cottonseed oil in skin prick testing.

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review considers this ingredient safe as provided as long as residue limits are respected at the cosmetic-grade level.

This ingredient shows up on a lot of "pore-clogging" lists but there's no real evidence behind that. It doesn't even have a comedogenic rating from an actual study; the numbers you'll find online come from blogs citing other blogs.

Just remember finished products made with so-called comedogenic ingredients often turn out not to be comedogenic at all. Some people still find this ingredient breaks them out. So if that's you, definitely trust your skin.

Because this ingredient is made up of saturated fatty acids in exactly the range the Malassezia yeast can metabolize, it may not be fungal acne safe.

It is important to note this ingredient comes from a tree that is part of the Toxicodendron species that are well-known for having urushiol, an allergen also found in poison ivy.

Though this ingredient comes from the fruit instead of sap (the sap contains the substance that causes itchy rashes), there is a very small chance that sensitive people could react.

Zinc Stearate is hydrophobic and repels water.

This ingredient can be sourced from non-animal or animal sources. It is best to reach out to the brand to see where they source this ingredient from.

It doesn't do anything active and just sits on skin to soften it and slow water loss.

The CIR reviews of this ingredient reported concentration usage across a wide range (0.0001% - 70%) depending on the product type. You'll most likely see double digits (~1-5%) in emulsions and double digits in sticks + balms.

This ingredient may not be fungal acne safe; the Malassezia yeast feeds on chains longer than 12 carbons which is exactly what this ingredient is built from (C12, C14, C16, and C18).

It's worth being honest that the lab picture isn't one-directional: medium-chain triglycerides and medium-chain free fatty acids were actually toxic to Malassezia in vitro, suppressing M. furfur and M. sympodialis. However, there's no human skin data showing that protective effect holds in a real formula.

The risk of allergies is low; Hydrogenated Coconut Oil caused no irritation after a single patch application and no sign of sensitization on retest 14 days late. This is also a refined triglyceride with no coconut protein left, so it's not likely to trigger coconut food allergies. But if you have reacted to coconut in cosmetics before, it's best to avoid this ingredient.

This ingredient shows up on a lot of ""pore-clogging"" lists but there's no real evidence behind that. It doesn't even have a comedogenic rating from an actual study; the numbers you'll find online come from blogs citing other blogs.

Ratings for other ingredients mostly come from a 1980s rabbit ear test. This test doesn't translate well to human skin or to real products because the ingredient sits at a much lower percentage. Some people still find it breaks them out. So if that's you, definitely trust your skin.

Ci 77891 is commonly found in sunscreens due to its ability to block UV rays.

Synthetically created CI 77492 is considered safer than those naturally found. This is because the synthetically created version may contain less impurities. Iron oxides are generally non-toxic and non-allergenic.