Welcome to our breakdown of the 50 best Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum dupes and alternatives.
Looking for dupes for a different product? You can use our Dupe Finder to search for them!
If you'd like to see the all of the Tom Ford dupes that we've found, check out our best Tom Ford dupes guide.
We use hundreds of science-backed factors to find you the best dupes.
Learn more about our dupe methodology
Our Roundup
Here's a quick roundup of our findings. Continue reading for the full breakdown!
Ellis Brooklyn's SALT Eau de Parfum is the dupe with the most similar ingredients. Our matching methodology puts it at an 89% ingredient match!
Of all of the dupes for this product, Al-Rehab's Choco Musk Perfume Oil is the most liked by our community. Our matching algorithm puts it at an 84% overall match!
- Ellis Brooklyn SALT Eau de Parfum 1
- Jo Malone London Cologne 2
- Jo Malone London Cologne 3
- Balmain Beauty Vent Vert Eau De Parfum 4
- Jo Malone London Cologne 5
- Diptyque Orphéon Eau De Parfum 6
- Clinique Calyx Eau De Parfum 7
- Jo Malone London Cologne 8
- Gucci Flora Gorgeous Orchid Eau De Parfum 9
- Revlon Ciara Eau De Cologne 10
- Le Labo Fragrances Eau De Parfum 11
- Gucci Flora Gorgeous Magnolia Eau De Parfum 12
- Nina Ricci L'Air Du Temps Eau De Parfum 13
- Jo Malone London Frangipani Flower Cologne 14
- Jo Malone London Cologne 15
- Britney Spears Fragrances Fantasy Intimate Edition Eau de Parfum 16
- Marc Jacobs Beauty Daisy Wild Eau De Parfum 17
- Elizabeth Taylor Passion Eau de Toilette 18
- Kilian Good Girl Gone Bad 19
- Jo Malone London Cologne Intense 20
- Chanel Cristalle Eau de Toilette 21
- Yves Saint Laurent Black Opium Eau De Parfum Glitter 22
- Michael Kors Sexy Amber Eau De Parfum 23
- Miller Harris Myrica Muse 24
- Juliette Has A Gun Lust For Sun Eau De Parfum 25
- Le Labo Fragrances Eau De Parfum 26
- Kilian Sunkissed Goddess 27
- Dolce & Gabbana Q Parfum 28
- Jo Malone London Huntsman Collection Cologne 29
- Dior Vanilla Diorama Eau De Parfum 30
- Jo Malone London Cologne Intense 31
- Clean Beauty Collective Simply Clean 32
- Chanel N°5 Eau de Parfum Spray 33
- Philosophy Amazing Grace Eau De Toilette 34
- Ariana Grande Fragrances Cloud Body Mist 35
- Ellis Brooklyn APRÈS Eau De Parfum 36
- Kayali Lovefest Burning Cherry 48 Eau De Parfum 37
- Le Labo Fragrances Eau De Parfum 38
- Charlotte Tilbury Cosmic Power Eau De Parfum 39
- Ellis Brooklyn WEST Eau De Parfum 40
- Ralph Lauren Romance Eau de Parfum 41
- Zara Waterlily Tea Dress Eau De Parfum 42
- Kenzo Flower By Kenzo Eau De Parfum 43
- Valentino Donna Born In Roma Intense Eau de Parfum 44
- Al-Rehab Choco Musk Perfume Oil 45
- Lancôme Trésor 46
- Paco Rabanne Fame Eau de Parfum 47
- Ellis Brooklyn SWEET Eau De Parfum 48
- Armani Beauty Acqua di Gioia Eau de Parfum 49
- Vivienne Westwood Fragrances Boudoir Eau De Parfum 50
Overview
What it is
Fragrance with 29 ingredients
Cool Features
It is fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe
Free From
It doesn't contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
93% match
with the ingredients and function of Ellis Brooklyn SALT Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 20 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $88.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
91% match
with the ingredients and function of Jo Malone London Cologne
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Jo Malone London Cologne
91% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 19 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
90% match
with the ingredients and function of Balmain Beauty Vent Vert Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 18 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
89% match
with the ingredients and function of Jo Malone London Cologne
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
89% match
with the ingredients and function of Diptyque Orphéon Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
89% match
with the ingredients and function of Clinique Calyx Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 18 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Jo Malone London Cologne
89% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Gucci Flora Gorgeous Orchid Eau De Parfum
89% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Revlon Ciara Eau De Cologne
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 18 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Le Labo Fragrances Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 19 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Gucci Flora Gorgeous Magnolia Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $159.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Nina Ricci L'Air Du Temps Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 19 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Jo Malone London Frangipani Flower Cologne
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $112.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Jo Malone London Cologne
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $33.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Britney Spears Fragrances Fantasy Intimate Edition Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 15 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $179.09 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Marc Jacobs Beauty Daisy Wild Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 19 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $108.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Elizabeth Taylor Passion Eau de Toilette
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 19 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $178.47 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Kilian Good Girl Gone Bad
88% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $162.11 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Jo Malone London Cologne Intense
87% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $58.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
87% match
with the ingredients and function of Chanel Cristalle Eau de Toilette
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 18 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Yves Saint Laurent Black Opium Eau De Parfum Glitter
87% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 19 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Michael Kors Sexy Amber Eau De Parfum
87% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Miller Harris Myrica Muse
87% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 15 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
87% match
with the ingredients and function of Juliette Has A Gun Lust For Sun Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 18 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $83.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Le Labo Fragrances Eau De Parfum
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 15 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Kilian Sunkissed Goddess
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $96.01 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Dolce & Gabbana Q Parfum
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 19 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Jo Malone London Huntsman Collection Cologne
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 21 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Dior Vanilla Diorama Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 20 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Jo Malone London Cologne Intense
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 15 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $38.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Clean Beauty Collective Simply Clean
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 14 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Chanel N°5 Eau de Parfum Spray
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 18 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $154.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Philosophy Amazing Grace Eau De Toilette
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 15 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $169.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Ariana Grande Fragrances Cloud Body Mist
86% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
85% match
with the ingredients and function of Ellis Brooklyn APRÈS Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $165.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
85% match
with the ingredients and function of Kayali Lovefest Burning Cherry 48 Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $60.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
85% match
with the ingredients and function of Le Labo Fragrances Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Charlotte Tilbury Cosmic Power Eau De Parfum
85% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 15 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $48.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Ellis Brooklyn WEST Eau De Parfum
85% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $165.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Ralph Lauren Romance Eau de Parfum
85% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $143.01 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Zara Waterlily Tea Dress Eau De Parfum
85% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 15 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
84% match
with the ingredients and function of Kenzo Flower By Kenzo Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $174.04 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
84% match
with the ingredients and function of Valentino Donna Born In Roma Intense Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 19 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $103.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Al-Rehab Choco Musk Perfume Oil
84% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Lancôme Trésor
84% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $78.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Paco Rabanne Fame Eau de Parfum
84% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 16 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $124.09 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Ellis Brooklyn SWEET Eau De Parfum
84% match
with the ingredients and function of Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 13 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $165.99 less expensive than the original product. Nice find!
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
84% match
with the ingredients and function of Armani Beauty Acqua di Gioia Eau de Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 17 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe and reef safe.
Price Comparison
This dupe is $128.99 more expensive than the original product.
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
Tom Ford Lost Cherry Eau de Parfum
84% match
with the ingredients and function of Vivienne Westwood Fragrances Boudoir Eau De Parfum
Dupe Explained
These products are both fragrances that contain. They've got a total of 18 ingredients in common.
They both do not contain any oils, parabens, silicones or sulfates. They both contain harsh alcohols, common allergens and fragrances.
Both products are also fungal acne (malassezia) safe.
Price Comparison
Learn more about this dupe
Looking for a full breakdown of the similarities and differences between these two products?
Check out our full comparison of these two products for all the details!
We're dedicated to providing you with the most up-to-date and science-backed ingredient info out there.
The data we've presented on this page has been verified by a member of the SkinSort Team.
Read more about us
